Case 2601055/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Jamieson v Cooper Industries Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601055/2022
- Decision date
- 13 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Welch Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 21 April 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The listed hearing for 26 August 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £100.12 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £796.00.
In addition, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay four weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because of failure to comply with section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 concerning written particulars of employment. That award was assessed at £1,560 net. The total sum ordered was £2,456.12.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent was found to have made unauthorised deductions from wages; ordered to pay £100.12 gross. | Upheld | — | £100 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent was found to have failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; ordered to pay £796.00. | Upheld | — | £796 |
| Other | Section 38 Employment Act 2002 award of four weeks' pay for failure to comply with section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 (statement of initial employment particulars); awarded at £1,560 net. | Upheld | — | £1,560 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,456
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.