Case 2601064/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S McLaren v Framework Housing Association and 2 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 2601064/2024
- Decision date
- 10 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss S McLaren
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 4 February 2025, Employment Judge M Butler, sitting alone, dealt with the claimant’s application to amend, the disability issue, strike out, and case management matters. The claimant confirmed that the purported amendment did not add any new claims and that she was not pursuing joinder of Ms Manning as a fourth respondent, so there was no amendment application to determine.
On disability, the tribunal considered the claimant’s asserted conditions and the medical material, including GP records and a redacted report. It was concerned by the redactions in the GP records and found that the records referred only to work-related stress. Applying the approach in Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, the tribunal held that stress was not a clinical impairment and found that the claimant was not disabled at the material time for the purposes of s.6 EqA 2010.
The direct race discrimination claim was withdrawn by the claimant. The direct sex discrimination claim was struck out under Rule 38 of the Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. The tribunal found there was no identifiable causal link between the treatment complained of and the claimant’s sex, and it also took into account the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted, including concerns about the redaction of medical records. The tribunal referred to Ezsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust when explaining that strike out of discrimination claims is reserved for the clearest cases, but concluded that this claim met that threshold.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the claimant was not disabled at the material time for the purposes of s.6 EqA 2010. It held that the records showed work-related stress only and that stress was not a clinical impairment, relying on Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The claimant withdrew the direct race discrimination claim. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal struck out the direct sex discrimination claim because it had no reasonable prospect of success and because of the unreasonable conduct of the proceedings by the claimant. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.6 EqA 2010
- Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council
- Rule 38 Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
- Ezsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.