Case 2601068/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K L Drinkell v St. James Fish Restaurant Limited FINAL HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 2601068/2023
- Decision date
- 4 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K L Drinkell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent's name to St. James Fish Restaurant Limited. It recorded that Miss K L Drinkell's employment began on 1 June 2014 and that her effective date of termination was 21 February 2023. The reason for dismissal was redundancy, and the statutory redundancy payment claim succeeded. The tribunal calculated that award as 5 weeks x 1.5 x £380 plus 3 weeks x 1 x £380, producing £3,990.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment succeeded. The tribunal calculated the award as 5 weeks x 1.5 x £380 plus 3 weeks x 1 x £380. | Upheld | — | £3,990 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded. The award comprised one week's pay in hand of £380 gross and two days' pay for the week ending 26 February 2023 of £152 gross. | Upheld | — | £532 |
| Holiday pay | The unpaid holiday pay claim was agreed by consent at the preliminary hearing on 14 August 2023 as four days' pay, and the tribunal ordered payment of £304 gross. | Settled | — | £304 |
| Breach of contract | The claim for failure to pay notice pay succeeded. The tribunal calculated 8 weeks' notice at £380 per week, then deducted earnings of £330 gross per week from 1 March 2023 for 7 weeks, leaving £730 gross payable. | Upheld | — | £730 |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.