Case 2601072/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Kanabar v The Matrix Alliance Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2601072/2024
- Decision date
- 13 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Kanabar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 11 February 2025, Employment Judge Adkinson sat alone and heard from Mr A Kanabar and Mr M Heijnk for The Matrix Alliance Ltd. The claimant accepted that he was not an employee of the respondent.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s breach of contract complaint. It held that, in any event, the complaint had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant could not identify any contractual entitlement to the expenses he claimed, and there was no other reason to allow the claim to continue.
The order stated that the dismissal of the breach of contract complaint did not affect any other claims, which were to be heard and determined in the normal way.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant accepted he was not an employee of the respondent. The tribunal also held that the breach of contract complaint had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant could not point to a contractual entitlement to the expenses he claimed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.