Case 2601076/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Vickers v Leicestershire County Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601076/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Vickers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 30 April 2020, Employment Judge Swann issued a Rule 52 judgment in case 2601076/2019, Mr C Vickers v Leicestershire County Council. The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
The extracted text does not set out any substantive findings on unfair dismissal or disability discrimination, and it does not record any remedy. The judgment is therefore a procedural disposal only, with no merits determination in the supplied text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not contain any substantive merits finding. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not contain any substantive merits finding. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.