Case 2601077/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Bridge Miss C McNeill Mr D Ransom v Nottingham City Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601077/2019
- Decision date
- 19 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Bridge Miss C McNeill Mr D Ransom
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 2 October 2019, and later in writing, Employment Judge Camp warned the claimants that he was proposing to strike out their claims because they appeared to have no reasonable prospects of success.
The claimants were given until 31 October 2019 to object or request a hearing. None of the claimants contacted the Tribunal after the preliminary hearing. The judge stated that his view of the claims' prospects had not changed and struck out the claims under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type; it records only that the claimants' claims were struck out under rule 37 because they appeared to have no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.