Case 2601080/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Fry v Transport UK East Midlands Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2601080/2024
- Decision date
- 13 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Fry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Nottingham on 13 February 2025, Employment Judge M Butler sitting alone heard the parties on Mr M Fry's application for a deposit order against Transport UK East Midlands Limited. The claimant was represented by Mr D Middleton, lay representative, and the respondent by Ms I Brown, counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's application for a deposit order. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying discrimination or flexible working issues, and it does not set out written reasons beyond noting that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The judgment states that no further written reasons will be given unless a request is made in writing within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing decision on the claimant's application for a deposit order; the application was dismissed. No substantive liability findings are recorded in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.