Case 2601086/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Watson v Proact IT UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601086/2019
- Decision date
- 4 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Watson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Batten issued a rule 52 judgment on 4 November 2019. The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by Mr J Watson.
No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or the merits of the underlying claims are set out in the extracted text. The judgment therefore records only the procedural outcome, not any determination of the issues originally pleaded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant and makes no substantive finding on the merits of this head. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant and makes no substantive finding on the merits of this head. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant and makes no substantive finding on the merits of this head. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.