Case 2601093/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Gaffney v Installation and Maintenance Services (Worksop) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601093/2019
- Decision date
- 2 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rachel Broughton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Gaffney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 2 October 2019 in Nottingham before Employment Judge Rachel Broughton, the parties informed the tribunal that terms of settlement had been agreed. The judgment records that the case was adjourned generally for those terms to be carried out.
The tribunal stated that, unless either party applied to put the case back in the list within 28 days, the claim would be dismissed on that date on withdrawal by the claimant, who gave his consent to that course at the hearing. The judgment contains no findings on liability and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Terms of settlement were agreed between the parties; the judgment does not separate or quantify this claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Terms of settlement were agreed between the parties; the judgment does not separate or quantify this claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Terms of settlement were agreed between the parties; the judgment does not separate or quantify this claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Terms of settlement were agreed between the parties; the judgment does not separate or quantify this claim. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.