Case 2601101/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. A Tanase v Hoar Cross Hall Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601101/2019
- Decision date
- 12 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. A Tanase
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only substantive disposal recorded in the extracted judgment is that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment does not set out any factual findings on liability, any contested issues, or any substantive reasons for a merits decision. It is a withdrawal disposal rather than a determination on the underlying complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the underlying cause of action. It records only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.