Case 2601113/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gary Gladwin Mr Carl Woodfield Mr Reece Minto Mr Lee Bates Mr Russell Jago Mr Conrad Jago Mr Thomas Murdoch v Gas Container Services Limited (in administration) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601113/2021
- Decision date
- 24 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Gary Gladwin Mr Carl Woodfield Mr Reece Minto Mr Lee Bates Mr Russell Jago Mr Conrad Jago Mr Thomas Murdoch
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Gas Container Services Ltd (in administration) failed to comply with the requirements of sections 188-190 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The claim for a protective award therefore succeeded, and the First Respondent was ordered to pay remuneration to all listed Claimants for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 9 April 2021.
The Tribunal also found that three Claimants were owed balances of holiday pay. Mr Woodfield was awarded £1,380.00 net for 13 days unpaid holiday, Mr Conrad Jago was awarded £727.19 net for 13 days unpaid holiday pay, and Mr Murdoch was awarded £996.09 net for 11 days unpaid holiday pay.
The Respondents did not appear or have representation at the hearing. Employment Judge Ahmed sat alone, and the judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim for a protective award under sections 188-190 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 succeeded. The award was specified as remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 9 April 2021, but no monetary amount was stated. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was awarded to Mr Woodfield, Mr Conrad Jago and Mr Murdoch in the net sums of £1,380.00, £727.19 and £996.09 respectively. | Upheld | — | £3,103 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,103
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 188-190 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.