Case 2601127/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Simmonds v Close Brothers Vehicle Hire Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2601127/2023
- Decision date
- 16 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer
- Venue
- Midlands East Tribunal via Cloud Video Platform
- Panel members
- Mr A Wood, Mr R Jones
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Simmonds
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of direct race discrimination, relying on her race described in the issues as Black Jamaican-British. The allegations concerned comments said to have been made by Emma Motlib, treatment during the claimant's apprenticeship placement, the absence of a contract of work, and the respondent's handling of the claimant's complaint.
The tribunal preferred the respondent's evidence where accounts conflicted and found, across the allegations, that the claimant had not proved facts from which it could decide that there was direct race discrimination. In several instances it also found that, even if the burden of proof had shifted, the respondent had shown the matters complained of were not because of race.
The tribunal noted that aspects of the complaint-handling process could have been improved, but found insufficient evidence that any faults in that process were less favourable treatment because of race. All direct race discrimination claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that all of the claimant's claims of direct race discrimination fail and are dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
16 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- sections 55 and 56 Equality Act 2010
- section 41 Equality Act 2010
- section 136 Equality Act 2010
- Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary
- Igen Ltd v Wong
- Madarassy v Nomura International Plc
- Hewage v Grampian Health Board
- Gould v St John's Downshire Hill
- Nagarajan v London Regional Transport
- Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan
- Amnesty International v Ahmed
- Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police v Bailey
- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Hendricks
- South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust v King
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.