Case 2601165/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Longland v Scott ELM Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601165/2021
- Decision date
- 22 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Longland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 April 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order sent to the parties on 22 March 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not contain findings on the underlying merits of the claim.
Because the claim was struck out, the hearing fixed for 6, 7 and 8 February 2023 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not determine the substantive merits of the claim. It records that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order sent on 22 March 2022 and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.