Case 2601169/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Vivian Salvador Dias v TestQ Technologies Ltd and 2 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601169/2020
- Decision date
- 11 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Vivian Salvador Dias
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn case nos. 2601169/2020 and 3314523/2020, Employment Judge Jeram Date recorded that the claimant’s wrongful dismissal claim and victimisation claim were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment also dismissed all claims against the Third Respondent following withdrawal and removed the Third Respondent as a party to the proceedings.
The judgment did not determine the merits of the remaining claims. It stated that the breach of contract, unauthorised deduction from wages, and holiday pay claims had more than little reasonable prospects of success, so no strike-out order or deposit order was made. It further stated that the race discrimination claims had little reasonable prospect of success and that a separate deposit order had been prepared.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Victimisation | The claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal said this claim had more than little reasonable prospects of success and made no strike-out order or deposit order. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal grouped this claim with the breach of contract and holiday pay claims and said they had more than little reasonable prospects of success; no strike-out order or deposit order was made. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal grouped this claim with the breach of contract and unlawful deduction claims and said they had more than little reasonable prospects of success; no strike-out order or deposit order was made. | Other | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal said the race discrimination claims had little reasonable prospect of success and that a separate deposit order had been prepared. | Other | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rule 52
- little reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.