Case 2601181/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr PJ Ujma v Tulip Ltd T/A Dalehead Foods JUDGEMENT The claim is struck out. — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601181/2020
- Decision date
- 2 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rachel Broughton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr PJ Ujma
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 24 October 2020, the tribunal gave Mr PJ Ujma an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that he had not complied with the tribunal's order of 8 July 2020 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Rachel Broughton therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The hearing listed for 18 and 19 November 2020 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Underlying claim head taken from the case listing; the judgment itself records only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Underlying claim head taken from the case listing; the judgment itself records only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.