Case 2601189/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Rozalski v The Co-Operative Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601189/2018
- Decision date
- 26 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Rozalski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at Nottingham before Employment Judge Batten alone, heard the case on 23, 24, 25 and 26 September 2019. The claimant was represented by a paralegal and the respondent by counsel.
The written judgment records that the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the relevant time limit.
No discrimination claim, remedy, monetary award, or detailed findings are recorded in the supplied judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records only that the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. Oral reasons were given, but no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.