Case 2601197/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Cooper v Nottinghamshire County Cricket Club — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601197/2019
- Decision date
- 8 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Cooper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 default judgment in Mr R Cooper v Nottinghamshire County Cricket Club, dated 8 August 2019. The extracted PDF text records that the claim succeeds, but it does not set out any substantive liability reasons or separate findings for the unfair dismissal and disability discrimination heads reflected in the case listing data.
The tribunal directed that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a remedy hearing. It also converted the hearing listed on 26 September 2019 into a remedy hearing. No monetary award, split award, or legal test is recorded in the extracted text provided here.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 default judgment. The extracted text states that 'the claim succeeds' and does not separate claim-by-claim findings in the judgment text supplied here. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Rule 21 default judgment. The extracted text states that 'the claim succeeds' and does not separate claim-by-claim findings in the judgment text supplied here. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.