Case 2601197/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Nicola Hill v Derby City Council — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601197/2020
- Decision date
- 26 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Nicola Hill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing concerning claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. The claimant had been employed as a Family Visitor and was summarily dismissed for gross misconduct after allegations that she accessed confidential files relating to an extended family member. The unfair dismissal claim was not determined and was listed for a final hearing.
The Tribunal considered whether the claimant had established disability for the purposes of section 6 Equality Act 2010. The claimant relied on PTSD, general mental health issues and depression, but had not provided medical evidence and had provided only limited information about the effect on normal day-to-day activities.
The Tribunal found that the claimant had not shown that, at the relevant time, her mental health conditions had a substantial and long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. It dismissed the disability discrimination claim. The Tribunal also stated that, even if disability had been established, it would have struck out the discrimination claim because of non-compliance with Tribunal orders, lack of active pursuit, unreasonable conduct of the proceedings, and no reasonable prospect of success.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal found the claimant had not established disability under section 6 Equality Act 2010. It also stated that, if disability had been established, the disability discrimination claim would in any event have been struck out under Rule 37. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was not determined at this preliminary hearing and was listed to proceed to a final hearing. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Rule 37 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP UKEAT/0263/09
- Aderemi v London and South Eastern Railway Ltd UKEAT/0316/12
- Tesco Stores Ltd v Tennant [2019] 11 WLUK
- Ms M Latchman v Reed Business Information Ltd [2002] ICR1453
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.