Case 2601200/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr James Smith v Timber Trade Products Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601200/2022
- Decision date
- 26 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr James Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr James Smith's claims for unfair dismissal and breach of contract against Timber Trade Products Limited were determined on the papers under Rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judge took account of the ET1, the initial schedule of loss, and Mr Smith's further information. The hearing listed for 19 September 2022 was cancelled.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal found that Mr Smith had been unfairly dismissed and that he was entitled to a basic award of £2,119.50, calculated from a gross weekly pay of £471, a net weekly pay of £381.46, age 58, and 3 completed years of service. It also made a notional award of £400 for loss of accrued employment rights, allowed past loss of £1,506.26 and future loss of £513.12 after taking mitigation and later employment into account, and applied a 15% uplift under s.207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 because the ACAS Code applied and there were obvious breaches of it. The unfair dismissal award was £5,219.71.
On breach of contract, the tribunal held that Mr Smith was dismissed in breach of contract because he was entitled to 3 weeks' notice. It assessed damages at £521.04 for the net loss during the notional notice period after crediting mitigation, then applied the same 15% uplift to reach £599.20. The tribunal said the claimant had taken reasonable steps to mitigate his losses, that the early loss period overlapped with the notice-period damages, and that the recoupment provisions did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 determination on the papers; award included a basic award, notional loss of accrued employment rights, past and future loss, and a 15% s.207A uplift. | Upheld | — | £5,220 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were assessed at net notice-period loss after credit for mitigation, then increased by a 15% s.207A uplift. | Upheld | — | £599 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,819
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,120
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21
- s.207A TULR(C)A 1992
- ACAS Code
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.