Case 2601204/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Bullimore v Graeme Carnegie t/a Miss Poppy's Coffee Shop and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601204/2019
- Decision date
- 20 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
4 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment. It recorded that the claim succeeds against the 1st and 2nd Respondents, Graeme Carnegie t/a Miss Poppy's Coffee Shop and John Gallagher t/a Miss Poppy's Coffee Shop.
The judgment did not determine remedy. It stated that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a separate Remedy Hearing, and that the question whether the claim against the 3rd Respondent should be dismissed under Rule 27(3) for lack of jurisdiction would also be determined at that hearing.
The hearing listed for 7 to 9 September 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claim succeeds against the 1st and 2nd Respondents, but the extracted judgment does not identify which specific causes of action succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
- Rule 27(3)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.