Case 2601205/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Pienaar v R1 Leicester Action For Mental Health Project (LAMP). R2 LAMP. R3 LAMP Mental Health Adovacy and information. — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601205/2019
- Decision date
- 5 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Pienaar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on withdrawal. The tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive findings of fact, liability analysis, or remedy assessment are set out in the extracted text.
The judgment identifies the respondents as Leicester Action For Mental Health Project (LAMP), LAMP, and LAMP Mental Health Advocacy and information. It is dated 5 September 2019 and is signed by Employment Judge Batten. The extracted text does not record any hearing attendance, legal test, or monetary award.
Because the claim was withdrawn, the tribunal did not determine the merits of any pleaded complaints in the extracted text. No discrimination characteristics, contractual findings, or wage calculations are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive liability findings are set out. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.