Case 2601223/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. S Algar v Bells Day Nursery Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601223/2020
- Decision date
- 2 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. S Algar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis Rule 21 judgment records four monetary findings against Bells Day Nursery Ltd. The tribunal held that there had been an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £726.70, less any tax and national insurance due on that sum. It also found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered £666.50, again less any tax and national insurance due.
The tribunal further held that Mrs Algar had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,376.04. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £6,896.00. The judgment does not set out further reasoning beyond these orders.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £726.70 less any sums for tax and national insurance due on that amount. | Upheld | — | £727 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,376.04. | Upheld | — | £4,376 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,896.00. | Upheld | — | £6,896 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £666.50 less any sums for tax and national insurance due on that amount. | Upheld | — | £667 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,665
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.