Case 2601225/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Kim Fletcher v Bells Day Nursery Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601225/2020
- Decision date
- 16 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Kim Fletcher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Miss Kim Fletcher against Bells Day Nursery Ltd. The tribunal upheld a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £404.21 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £197.80 net damages.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £404.21 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £404 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £197.80 net in damages. | Upheld | — | £198 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £1,011.00, calculated by reference to age 35, five full years' service, and gross weekly pay of £202.20. | Upheld | — | £1,011 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £153.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £153 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,766
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.