Case 2601230/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Swierc v Alloga UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601230/2020
- Decision date
- 24 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Swierc
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 12 August 2021, the tribunal gave Mr B Swierc an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why his claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued and he had failed to comply with case management orders. The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge Hutchinson therefore struck out the claim on 24 August 2021. The judgment states that the hearing listed for 24 September 2021 to 1 October 2021 would not take place. No merits findings or monetary award were made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records a global strike-out for non-pursuit and non-compliance with case management orders; the pleaded claim type is taken from the case listing context because the extracted text does not restate it. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records a global strike-out for non-pursuit and non-compliance with case management orders; the pleaded claim type is taken from the case listing context because the extracted text does not restate it. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a global strike-out for non-pursuit and non-compliance with case management orders; the pleaded claim type is taken from the case listing context because the extracted text does not restate it. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records a global strike-out for non-pursuit and non-compliance with case management orders; the pleaded claim type is taken from the case listing context because the extracted text does not restate it. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.