Case 2601252/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Singh v 1) Paramjit Singh Dhaliwal 2) Paramjit Dhaliwal 3) Smoke and Spice 4) Rickshaw Ricks Holdings Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601252/2019
- Decision date
- 6 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Singh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment dated 6 August 2019 is a Rule 21 default judgment issued by Employment Judge Clark in Case Nos. 2601252/2019, 2601253/2019, 2601254/2019 and 2601255/2019. It records that the claims succeed against Paramjit Singh Dhaliwal, Paramjit Dhaliwal, Smoke and Spice and Rickshaw Ricks Holdings Ltd.
No remedy was fixed in this decision. The judgment directs that the attended Preliminary Hearing listed for 15 August 2019 be converted to a Remedy Hearing, at which the judge may either determine remedy or make further case management orders. The hearing listed for 9 October 2019 remained listed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The Rule 21 judgment records that the claims succeed, but the extracted text does not separately set out this head of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Rule 21 judgment records that the claims succeed, but the extracted text does not separately set out this head of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.