Case 2601254/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. J Kurianczyk v Integrated Cleaning Management Limited Ms. Debora Sandhu — 2018
- Case reference
- 2601254/2018
- Decision date
- 30 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. J Kurianczyk
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Heap, sitting alone at Nottingham on 30 November 2018, struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain it. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons are provided in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out on the basis that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain it. | Struck out | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The Tribunal held it was just and equitable to extend time so the age discrimination complaint could proceed out of time; no merits finding is recorded. | Other | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The Tribunal held it was just and equitable to extend time so the race discrimination complaint could proceed out of time; no merits finding is recorded. | Other | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.