Case 2601276/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Pienczak v GT Race and Trailers Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601276/2018
- Decision date
- 23 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Pienczak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs A Pienczak, a Polish seamstress, brought claims for unfair dismissal, race discrimination, age discrimination and a redundancy payment. At the preliminary hearing on 23 May 2019, the respondent said it had paid her £506.25 as additional redundancy payment and £119.25 as additional holiday pay. After confirming receipt, the claimant withdrew the redundancy payment complaint. She also withdrew the age discrimination complaint, saying she did not believe her treatment was linked to age.
The race discrimination complaint was based on alleged treatment by another employee, Jackie, an unidentified incident in September or October 2017, a 10 January 2018 incident in which Jackie allegedly called the claimant a "stupid woman", and the claimant's dismissal. The claimant said she believed the treatment was linked to her nationality, but she could not explain why beyond saying that Jackie hated her, that she was ignored, and that "they" did not want her at work.
Employment Judge Ayre held that the race discrimination claim was very weak because the claimant had not identified any prima facie link between the alleged treatment and nationality. However, applying the caution normally required before striking out fact-sensitive discrimination claims, and taking account of the claimant's lack of representation and illness, the tribunal declined to strike out the claim under Rule 37.
Instead, the tribunal found the race discrimination allegation had little reasonable prospect of success and made a Rule 39 deposit order for £250. In deciding the amount, the tribunal took the claimant's means into account, noting her monthly income of £493, lack of savings, and the fact that £250 was about two weeks' income.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Withdrawn by the claimant at the preliminary hearing; the tribunal dismissed the complaint after she said she did not believe her treatment was linked to age. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Redundancy | Withdrawn by the claimant after the respondent said it had paid £506.25 additional redundancy payment and the claimant confirmed receipt; the tribunal dismissed the complaint upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal refused to strike out the complaint, but found it had little reasonable prospect of success and made a £250 Rule 39 deposit order as a condition of continuing to advance it. | Other | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 37 strike out
- Rule 39 deposit order
- Anyanwu v South Bank Student Union
- Williams v Real Care Agency Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.