Case 2601287/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Anthony Till v Office Update Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601287/2019
- Decision date
- 11 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge ADKINSON
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Anthony Till
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 11 October 2019 Employment Judge Adkinson issued a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The tribunal recorded that the complaints of indirect discrimination on grounds of disability under section 19 of the Equality Act and unfavourable treatment because of something arising as a consequence of disability under section 15 of the Equality Act were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant, Mr Anthony Till.
The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claim or claims would proceed to a hearing, to be notified in due course. No findings are made in this judgment on those remaining matters, and no remedy is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Indirect discrimination under s.19 Equality Act; dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability under s.15 Equality Act; dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.19 Equality Act
- s.15 Equality Act
- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.