Case 2601288/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Wesson v Not Guilty Food Co Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601288/2021
- Decision date
- 4 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Wesson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment dated 22 July 2021. The tribunal records that the claim succeeds and directs that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing listed for 18 October 2021 at 10.00. The judgment extract contains no findings of fact or reasoned analysis beyond that outcome.
The GOV.UK case listing records jurisdiction codes of breach of contract, maternity and pregnancy rights, and sex discrimination. Because the judgment does not apportion success between heads of claim or set out any award, no remedy figure is recorded in this extract.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment text only states that 'the claim succeeds'. This claim type follows the GOV.UK jurisdiction code for the case; the extract does not break the success down by head of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment text only states that 'the claim succeeds'. This claim type follows the GOV.UK jurisdiction code for the case; the extract does not break the success down by head of claim. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment text only states that 'the claim succeeds'. This claim type follows the GOV.UK jurisdiction code for the case; the extract does not break the success down by head of claim. | Upheld | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.