Case 2601299/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Orton v Ganley Leisure Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2601299/2023
- Decision date
- 4 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Orton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 2 June 2023 and the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore made a Rule 21 determination on the papers. The judgment records findings that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Miss L Orton’s wages, that she was unfairly dismissed, that holiday entitlement had not been paid, and that a statement of particulars of employment had not been provided.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £13,737.40 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages. On the unfair dismissal claim, it awarded a basic award of £2,514.00 and a compensatory award of £17,595.60. It also ordered payment of £2,011.20 for unpaid holiday entitlement and £2,011.20 for failure to provide a statement of particulars of employment. The total award was £37,869.40, and the hearing listed for 16 to 18 December 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £13,737 |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £17,596 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,011 |
| Other | Award for failure to provide a statement of particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £2,011 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £37,869
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,514
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £17,596
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.