Case 2601305/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Eniola Adebambo v EVCLTHREE Ltd (in administration) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2601305/2021
- Decision date
- 7 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham Heard
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss Eniola Adebambo
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 2 June 2023, before Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone, the tribunal held that Miss Adebambo's employment did not transfer to Culina Logistics Ltd. The claims against the second respondent were therefore dismissed. The claim for a protective award also failed and was dismissed.
As against EVCLTHREE Ltd (in administration), the tribunal found that Miss Adebambo was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,341.96. It also found that she was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered compensation of £2,528.68. In addition, the tribunal found that the first respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £493.10.
The unfair dismissal claim and the unlawful deduction of wages claim were withdrawn and dismissed. The total compensation payable by the first respondent was recorded as £8,363.74.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The tribunal held that the claimant's employment did not transfer to the second respondent, Culina Logistics Ltd, and the claims against that respondent were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The protective award claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claimant was dismissed by the first respondent by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,341.96. | Upheld | — | £5,342 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant was dismissed by the first respondent in breach of contract in respect of notice, and compensation of £2,528.68 was ordered. | Upheld | — | £2,529 |
| Holiday pay | The first respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £493.10. | Upheld | — | £493 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deduction of wages claim was withdrawn and dismissed. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,364
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.