Case 2601336/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Mulligan v Manor Skips Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601336/2020
- Decision date
- 30 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Butler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Mulligan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the Respondent failed to enter a response. On that basis, it entered judgment that Miss Mulligan was unfairly dismissed and that her claims for notice pay and holiday pay succeeded.
The tribunal ordered payment of £262.72 for notice pay and £145.31 for holiday pay. It also made an unfair dismissal award consisting of a basic award of £262.72 and compensation for loss of statutory rights of £262.72. The total award was £933.47.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Respondent failed to enter a response and that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed. The unfair dismissal award recorded in the judgment consists of a basic award of £262.72 and compensation for loss of statutory rights of £262.72. | Upheld | — | £525 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this head of claim as notice pay and orders £262.72. The extracted text does not use the phrase wrongful dismissal, so this is classified as breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £263 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the Claimant's holiday pay claim succeeded and awards £145.31. | Upheld | — | £145 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £933
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £263
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £263
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.