Case 2601340/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Claimant v E.ON Energy UK plc T/a E.ON Energy UK — 2022

Case reference: 2601340/2021
Decision date: 31 March 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge P Britton
Venue: Nottingham

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

E.ON Energy UK plc T/a E.ON Energy UK

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At an open preliminary hearing before Employment Judge P Britton sitting alone, the tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person pursuant to s6 and Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010. The written record states that full oral reasons were given at the hearing and that neither party requested them in writing, so they are not set out in the judgment.

The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of any discrimination claim in this record. The claimant's application to amend the current claim to include victimisation was adjourned part heard because the hearing ran out of time, and the matter was listed to continue on 4 April 2022 by Cloud Video Platform. The respondent was directed to provide an agreed bundle at least seven days before the resumed hearing, including the attachments sent with the claimant's email of 9 December 2021 and any other relevant material.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Preliminary issue only; the tribunal found the claimant to be a disabled person under s6 and Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010. The application to amend the claim to add victimisation was adjourned part heard and no substantive merits decision was made in this record.	Other	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.