Case 2601341/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Tebbutt v Aerofab Fabrications Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601341/2021
- Decision date
- 19 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Tebbutt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 19 January 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated concerns were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 19 January 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim.
The judgment also records that all future hearings were cancelled. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were made in the reasons provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim types; it records that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's order of 19 January 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.