Case 2601347/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr John Aston & Others (see attached schedule v Taylor Bloxham Group Limited (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601347/2020
- Decision date
- 12 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr John Aston & Others (see attached schedule
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 and found that the respondent had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It held the complaint well-founded in respect of all employees at the respondent's Tolwell Road, Bursom Industrial Estate, Leicester premises and in respect of Alexo Wint, who was employed at Unit 4, Vitrivius Way, Meridian Business Park, Leicester.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found the complaint under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 well-founded and made a protective award. The judgment does not split a monetary figure per claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.