Case 2601349/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Sissons v Stelco Europa Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601349/2021
- Decision date
- 6 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flint
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Sissons
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr W Sissons, brought an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Stelco Europa Limited (in voluntary liquidation). The respondent did not attend the remote hearing. Employment Judge Flint applied rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure and decided to proceed in the respondent's absence, noting that the respondent had been aware of the proceedings, had not applied for an adjournment, and had failed to comply with case management directions.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence in full. It found that the gross amount deducted from his wages was £5,899.39, and noted that the respondent had accepted in its ET3 response that it had withheld these wages. The tribunal therefore upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim.
The tribunal increased the sum awarded by 15%, amounting to £884.61, because it was satisfied that the respondent had failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary grievance procedures when it held back the claimant's wages without giving him an opportunity to make representations in a fair and transparent process. The final gross sum ordered was £6,784.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that £5,899.39 had been deducted from wages and noted the respondent's ET3 admission that it had withheld those wages. It increased the award by 15% (£884.61) because the respondent had not complied with the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary grievance procedures, so the final gross sum ordered was £6,784. | Upheld | — | £6,784 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,784
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5,899
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary grievance procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.