Case 2601354/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Dawson v Lindsay Greene Makeup Hair & Beauty — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601354/2021
- Decision date
- 7 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Dawson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss K Dawson's claim. On 29 September 2021 it wrote to the claimant giving her an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted by or on behalf of the claimant had been scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious, that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 20 September 2021, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
No substantive liability issue was determined. The judgment records only that the hearing fixed for 8 October 2021 would not take place and that the claim was struck out by Employment Judge Jeram on 7 October 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive jurisdiction of the claim in the extracted text. The claim was struck out after the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about strike-out on the grounds of scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious conduct, non-compliance with the order dated 20 September 2021, and lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.