Case 2601355/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Saleh v Vibrant Interiors Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601355/2020
- Decision date
- 29 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Saleh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Swann recorded that the respondent, Vibrant Interiors Limited, had not presented a response. The tribunal therefore entered judgment on the claim as presented in the Rule 21 template.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £863.55 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £604.80 for that element. The judgment does not split any further remedy or record interest, and the total payable on the face of the judgment is £1,468.35.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £863.55. | Upheld | — | £864 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £604.80. | Upheld | — | £605 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,468
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.