Case 2601361/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J I Hawkins v Abbotts Pub Company Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2601361/2022
- Decision date
- 31 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Welch Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J I Hawkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 31 January 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge Welch therefore struck out case numbers 2601361/2022 and 2601559/2022. The brief judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action or record any financial remedy, and it states only that the claims were struck out on the basis that they had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action for case number 2601361/2022. It records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, after the claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's 31 January 2024 letter. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action for case number 2601559/2022. It records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, after the claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's 31 January 2024 letter. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.