Case 2601368/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Woodman-Clarke v University of Nottingham — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601368/2021
- Decision date
- 6 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rachel Broughton
- Venue
- Nottingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Woodman-Clarke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the case. It recorded that the claimant and respondent had agreed terms of settlement.
The proceedings were stayed for 14 days, until 4.00 pm on 20 October 2021, to allow implementation of the settlement. The tribunal directed that, unless either party applied for the matter to be relisted during that period, the claim would be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant at the end of the stay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed and the case was stayed for implementation. The specific pleaded claims are not set out in the judgment text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category hint and is therefore lower confidence. | Settled | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed and the case was stayed for implementation. The specific pleaded claims are not set out in the judgment text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category hint and is therefore lower confidence. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.