Case 2601371/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B McNaught v Croner Group Limited Heard: Remotely via CVP — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601371/2019
- Decision date
- 25 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B McNaught
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis reserved judgment determined a preliminary issue in Mrs McNaught's disability discrimination proceedings. By consent, her epilepsy and spinal problems were accepted as disabilities under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The respondent continued to dispute whether psoriasis, diverticulitis and stress met the statutory definition, and the tribunal considered the issues by reference to impairment, substantial adverse effect and long-term effect.
The tribunal found that diverticulitis was a permanent, lifelong condition with intermittent flare-ups causing abdominal pain, cramps, bloating, irregular bowel movements, lethargy, and the need to remain close to toilet facilities. It held that these flare-ups substantially affected normal day-to-day activities such as shopping, socialising and travelling, and that the long-term test was satisfied. It reached the same conclusion on psoriasis, which it found to be a permanent physical impairment with intermittent flare-ups affecting walking, stairs, driving, housework and manual dexterity.
On the mental health evidence, the tribunal found an underlying mental impairment within the claimant's presentation of stress, anxiety and depression. It accepted that the impairment affected sleep, socialising, leaving the house, memory and emotional composure, and held that the effects were more than minor or trivial and likely to recur. The tribunal concluded that Mrs McNaught was disabled at all material times by virtue of all the impairments she relied on. During the hearing, she withdrew two indirect sex discrimination claims, which the tribunal recorded would be dismissed. No monetary award was made in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal held that the claimant was disabled at all material times by virtue of the impairments relied on. The substantive disability discrimination claims were not finally determined in this judgment. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Claim 12, an indirect sex discrimination complaint, was withdrawn during the hearing and the tribunal recorded that it would be dismissed. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | Claim 13, an indirect sex discrimination complaint, was withdrawn during the hearing and the tribunal recorded that it would be dismissed. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- 2011 guidance under s.6(5) Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v Patent Office
- Ginn v Tesco Stores Limited
- Patel v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council
- Woodrup v London Borough of Southwark
- Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd
- SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.