Case 2601398/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Laura Thompson v The Vine Ashby Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601398/2020
- Decision date
- 14 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Laura Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 21 judgment dated 14 July 2020, Employment Judge Clark determined Ms Laura Thompson's claims against The Vine Ashby Limited without the listed hearing on 16 September 2020 going ahead. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £513.36.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £333.60. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £398.74.
On the working time claim, the tribunal found that the respondent had refused to permit the claimant to exercise her right to daily rest under regulation 10(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and awarded £333.60. It also found that, as at the date the claim was presented, the respondent was in breach of its obligation to provide a written statement of main terms of employment and ordered payment of £1,566. The total of the awards was £3,145.30.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £513.36. | Upheld | — | £513 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £333.60. | Upheld | — | £334 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £398.74. | Upheld | — | £399 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found the respondent had refused to permit the claimant to exercise her right to daily rest under regulation 10(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and assessed compensation at £333.60. | Upheld | — | £334 |
| Other | The tribunal found that, at the date the claim was presented, the respondent was in breach of its obligation to provide the claimant with a written statement of main terms of employment and ordered payment of £1,566. | Upheld | — | £1,566 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,145
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.