Case 2601417/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Agnieska Kutrazeba v CML Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601417/2019
- Decision date
- 16 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Agnieska Kutrazeba
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leicester on 14 October 2019, Employment Judge Jeram, sitting alone, recorded the outcome of the claimant's wage-related claims. The judgment states that the claimant's claims for wages and holiday pay were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The written record notes that reasons for the judgment had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The judgment also records that the remaining claims would be considered at a Preliminary Hearing listed for 6 January 2020 at 10:00am, so this decision did not determine those claims on their merits.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers to a claim for wages, but it does not specify the underlying legal basis. The tribunal recorded that the wages claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.