Case 2601419/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Duckett v L H Group Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601419/2021
- Decision date
- 12 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Duckett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Duckett's claim against L H Group Services Ltd was issued in the Midlands East Region of the Employment Tribunals and sent to the respondent on 1 July 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Ahmed stated that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that the claim succeeds. It also directs that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing on 18 November 2021 at 14.00. The extracted text does not break down the success between the age discrimination, sex discrimination, and unfair dismissal claims, and it records no monetary award at this stage.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The extracted judgment text does not identify separate findings for this head of claim; it states that the claim succeeds under rule 21. | Upheld | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | The extracted judgment text does not identify separate findings for this head of claim; it states that the claim succeeds under rule 21. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not identify separate findings for this head of claim; it states that the claim succeeds under rule 21. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.