Case 2601427/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S. A. Lees First v Bellway Homes Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2601427/2022
- Decision date
- 27 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S. A. Lees First
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 29 March 2023, Employment Judge Broughton considered only whether Ms Lees was disabled by PTSD during the relevant period, agreed between the parties as 15 October 2021 to 7 March 2022. The respondent had already conceded that she was disabled at that time by stress, anxiety and depression; the disputed issue was whether PTSD also met the section 6 Equality Act 2010 definition.
The tribunal reviewed medical evidence from after the October 2017 workplace assault, including GP records, Dr Lawson's reports, occupational health input, and Dr Laher's June and July 2018 psychological assessment. It found that Ms Lees had PTSD from about November 2017 to around July 2018, with symptoms including insomnia, nightmares, headaches, withdrawal, low motivation, concentration problems, and physical symptoms linked to trauma, but held that the PTSD itself was not long term because that specific diagnosis changed to stress-related and adjustment-disorder-type conditions after mid-2018.
For the relevant period in 2022, the tribunal accepted that dealing with aggressive clients affected Ms Lees's sleep and mood, but it found the contemporaneous records recorded work stress rather than PTSD and did not show a recurrence of PTSD that was likely to last 12 months. Dr Laher's 2022 letter was not enough, on the evidence available, to establish a likely recurrence of PTSD. The judgment therefore dismissed the PTSD disability issue, while recording that Ms Lees was disabled during the relevant period because of stress, anxiety and depression. No monetary remedy was awarded in this preliminary decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Reserved judgment on a preliminary disability issue only. The tribunal dismissed the claimant's case that she was disabled by PTSD at the relevant time, but accepted she was disabled during the relevant period by stress/anxiety/depression. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1 paragraph 2
- Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1 paragraph 5
- Goodwin v Patent Office
- J v DLA Piper
- Boyle v SCA Packaging Ltd
- Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Limited
- All Answers Ltd v W
- Paterson v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- Ginn v Tesco Stores Ltd
- McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.