Case 2601428/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Z Yousif v Gershon Resourcing Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601428/2019
- Decision date
- 9 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Z Yousif
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leicester on 21 November 2019 before Employment Judge Ahmed sitting alone. The claimant, Ms Z Yousif, did not appear and was not represented. The respondent, Gershon Resourcing Limited, was represented by Ms Mallick of Counsel.
The tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's claims. These were pleaded as unlawful deduction of wages in relation to arrears of pay and unpaid sick pay, outstanding holiday pay, and breach of contract in relation to notice pay, unpaid expenses and sick pay. The written judgment records only the outcome and does not set out further findings of fact or a detailed liability analysis.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing and the written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The judgment is dated 9 December 2019.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim in relation to arrears of pay and unpaid sick pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for outstanding holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim in relation to notice pay, unpaid expenses and sick pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.