Case 2601445/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Ms K Clarridge, Head of Group HR — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601445/2020
- Decision date
- 2 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant’s breach of contract claim. It found that he was dismissed without receiving the notice due under his contract of employment, but also found that he had been paid a sum in lieu of notice equivalent to the earnings he would otherwise have received. On that basis, the tribunal recorded that he suffered no loss and therefore made no order for damages.
The claim for accrued but untaken annual leave outstanding at termination was dismissed. The tribunal found that all of the claimant’s accrued holiday entitlement had already been paid to him, so there was no outstanding holiday pay due at the date of termination.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed without the notice due under the contract of employment, but made no order for damages because he had been paid a sum in lieu of notice equivalent to the earnings he would have received and suffered no loss. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for accrued but untaken annual leave outstanding at the date of termination was dismissed because all of the claimant’s accrued entitlement had been paid to him. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.