Case 2601445/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Muhammad Ghaffar v Beauty Spot (Notts) Ltd (first Respondent) Mr Rashid Majid (second Respondent) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2601445/2022
- Decision date
- 23 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Wilson
- Venue
- Nottingham Tribunal
- Panel members
- Mr J Akhtar, Mr D Green
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal (Employment Judge N Wilson with Mr J Akhtar and Mr D Green) unanimously found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by both respondents for reasons arising from his disability, and that the first and second respondents subjected him to discrimination arising from disability (s.15 EqA), indirect discrimination (s.19 EqA), and failed to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments (ss.20-21 EqA). The first respondent was also found to have made an unlawful deduction from wages by failing to pay statutory sick pay/holiday pay, failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars, and failed to provide written reasons for dismissal. A claim for failure to provide itemised pay statements was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The parties agreed remedy by consent. The second respondent was to pay £45,193.75 (basic award £5,985, loss of statutory rights £350, loss of earnings £14,820, injury to feelings £15,000, plus 25% ACAS uplift £9,038.75) by structured instalments to 1 November 2024. The first respondent was to pay £11,551.21 (holiday pay £5,043.36, SSP £1,092.85, notice pay £4,275, failure to provide written reasons £570, failure to provide written particulars £570).
The total agreed award was £56,744.96.
Claims and outcomes
8 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 referencesRemedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £56,745
- Basic award
- £5,985
- Compensatory award
- £14,820
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.