Case 2601447/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Wayne v Transvac Systems Limited AT A FINAL HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601447/2020
- Decision date
- 26 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Wayne
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr Wayne’s claim of unfair dismissal succeeded. It found the dismissal was unfair on narrow points of procedure, but also found that the claimant’s conduct caused his dismissal. On that basis, the tribunal said it was just and equitable to reduce any compensation otherwise flowing from the dismissal by 100% under sections 122(2) and 123(6) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal further found that, but for the procedural failure, there would have been a fair dismissal. It therefore held that compensation should also be reduced by 100% under section 123(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records liability for unfair dismissal but does not specify any monetary sum payable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim but found that the claimant's conduct caused the dismissal and reduced any compensation by 100% under ss.122(2), 123(1) and 123(6) ERA 1996. No monetary sum is stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.122(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.123(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.123(6) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.