Case 2601449/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. R Allsopp v Hilltop Motorcycles Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601449/2020
- Decision date
- 27 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. R Allsopp
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr R Allsopp, brought claims against Hilltop Motorcycles Ltd for unauthorised deductions from wages, unpaid holiday pay, and notice pay. The hearing was conducted remotely by CVP before Employment Judge Heap sitting alone. The tribunal recorded that the holiday year ran from 1 January to 31 March 2020 and that the effective date of termination was 31 March 2020.
On the wages claim, the respondent accepted that the claimant had not been paid for 30 and 31 March 2020. The tribunal therefore held that the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was well founded and ordered payment of £119 gross, subject to tax and national insurance deductions.
On annual leave, the tribunal accepted the respondent's evidence from its online calendar that the claimant had taken leave on 14 January, 5 February and 25 February 2020, in addition to the paid holiday on 1 and 2 January and 17 March 2020. The tribunal found that he had taken six days' leave but had accrued entitlement to seven days by the termination date, so the claim for unpaid holiday pay succeeded to the extent of one day only. The award was £59.50 gross, subject to deductions. The tribunal rejected the respondent's offset argument because there was no relevant agreement under regulation 14(4) Working Time Regulations 1998.
The notice pay claim was dismissed. The tribunal found that the claimant had not given notice of termination and that his words and conduct at the 31 March 2020 meeting were consistent with bringing the employment to an end then and there. As a result, the respondent was not obliged to pay notice pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted that two days' pay for 30 and 31 March 2020 remained unpaid. | Upheld | — | £119 |
| Holiday pay | Claim succeeded only to the extent of one untaken day of annual leave under regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £60 |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay claim failed because the claimant did not give notice; his words and actions were found consistent with ending employment on 31 March 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £179
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reg. 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.